The French Contract Law Reform: a Source of Inspiration?

This book results from the Contract Law Workshop of the 20th Ius Commune Conference held 26-27 November 2015. The theme of this Workshop was: ‘The French Contract Law Reform: a Source of Inspiration?’ Since the conference in November 2015, all authors have incorporated comments on the final version of the ordonnance.
Editor(s):
Sophie Stijns, Sanne Jansen
Reeks:
Ius Commune Europaeum
Volume:
153
boek | verschenen | 1e editie
augustus 2016 | x + 231 blz.

Paperback
€ 72,-


ISBN 9781780684192


Als u intekent op de reeks, wordt elke nieuwe titel uit de reeks u automatisch toegestuurd. U mag een reeks vrijblijvend schriftelijk opzeggen na ontvangst van min. 2 opeenvolgende uitgaven.

Inhoud

The French projet d’ordonnance, which reformed contract law, the general regime of obligations and the proof of obligations appeared in February 2015. One year later, in February 2016, the final version of the ordonnance was published. The ordonnance thoroughly reforms French contract law and the law of obligations and will enter into force in October 2016.

This book results from the Contract Law Workshop of the 20th Ius Commune Conference held 26-27 November 2015. The theme of this Workshop was: ‘The French Contract Law Reform: a Source of Inspiration?’ Since the conference in November 2015, all authors have incorporated comments on the final version of the ordonnance.

Whereas Van Loock briefly sketches the antecedents and the outcome of the reform, the other authors each tackle specific topics of the reform that surprised and/or excited the legal community. Pannebakker tackles the precontractual phase and assesses the attractiveness of the reform for international commercial transactions. Peeraer gives a critical overview of the doctrine of nullity in the ordonnance. Leone explores the potential impact of the ‘significant imbalance’ test in the new ordonnance on employment contracts. In their contributions, Lutzi and Oosterhuis discuss the much-debated provision that introduces the theory of imprévision. The contributions by Jansen and Verkempinck are both focused on remedies: the newly introduced price reduction remedy and damages. Storme criticises the new rules on set-off in the ordonnance, and Mahé addresses the question why the final version of the ordonnance omitted the issue of interpersonal effects of fundamental rights on contractual freedom.

Hoofdstukken

Table of Contents (p. 0)

Introduction (p. 1)

The Reform of the French Law of Obligations: How Long will the Belgians Remain Napoleon's Most Loyal Subjects? (p. 7)

Pre-Contractual Phase: Reflections on the Attractiveness of the New French Rules for the Parties to International Commercial Transactions (p. 29)

Nullity in the Ordonnance (p. 49)

A Tale of Novelty and Continuity: Exploring the Future Judicial Control of Employment Contracts in the French Contract Law Reform (p. 73)

Introducing Imprévision into French Contract Law - A Paradigm Shift in Comparative Perspective (p. 89)

Commercial Impracticability and the Missed Opportunity of the French Contract Law Reform: Doctrinal, Historial and Law and Economics Arguments - Comment on Lutzi's Introducing Imprévison into French Contract Law (p. 113)

Price Reduction under the French Contract Law Reform (p. 131)

The Measure of Damages in the French Contract Law Reform - Lessons from far more Inspiring Systems (p. 157)

Set-off in the French Reform of the Law of Obligations: a Tale of Missed Opportunities? (p. 201)

Fundamental Rights in the French Contract Law Reform (p. 209)

Over de reeks

Ius Commune Europaeum

Subscribe to the series and receive a 15% discount on each volume.

The ‘Ius Commune Europaeum’ series focuses on the common foundations of the legal systems of the Member States of the European Union. It includes horizontal comparative legal studies as well as studies on the effect of EU law, treaties and international regulation within the national legal systems. All substantive fields of law are covered.

The series is published under the auspices of METRO, the Institute for Transnational Legal Research at the Maastricht University.

Guidelines for the submission of a manuscript or proposal can be found here.

Editorial Board
Prof. Dr. J. Smits (chair - Tilburg University, the Netherlands)
Prof. Dr. M. Faure (Maastricht University and Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands)
Prof. Dr. E. Vos (Maastricht University, the Netherlands).


Meer over deze reeks